The word "God" is often employed as though it had a fixed meaning.
His part in an event or His relation to a movement is discussed with the
assumption that all who speak have in mind the same Being. "God" is the
name a man gives to his highest inspiration, and men vary greatly in
that which inspires them. One man's god is his belly, another's his
reputation, a third's cleverness. Napoleon reintroduced the cult of the
God of authority, by establishing the Concordat with Rome, because as he
bluntly put it, "men require to be kept in order." A number of socially
minded thinkers, of whom the best known is George Eliot, deified
humanity and gave themselves to worship and serve it. "Whatever thy
heart clings to and relies on," wrote Luther, "that is properly thy
God." A Christian is one who clings to Him in whom Jesus trusted, one
who responds to the highest inspirations
of Jesus of Nazareth. And a glance over
Church history leaves one feeling that few Christians, even among
careful thinkers, have had thoroughly Christian ideas of God.
A principal fault has been the method used in arriving at the thought
of God. Men began with what was termed "Natural Religion." They studied
the universe and inferred the sort of Deity who made and ruled it. It
was intricately and wisely designed; its God must be omniscient. It was
vast; He must be omnipotent. It displayed the same orderliness
everywhere; He must be omnipresent. In epochs when men emphasized the
beneficence of nature—its beauty, its usefulness, its wisdom—they
concluded that its Creator was good. In an epoch, like the latter part
of the Nineteenth Century, they drew a very different conclusion.
Charles Darwin wrote, "What a book a Devil's chaplain might write on the
clumsy, wasteful, blundering, low and horribly cruel works of nature."
Christians never stopped with the view of God drawn from "Natural
Religion." They made this their basis, and then added to it the God of
"Revealed Religion," contained
in the Bible. They selected all the
texts that spoke of God, drawing them from Leviticus and
Ecclesiastes as confidently as from the gospels and St. Paul, and
constructed a Biblical doctrine of God, which they added to the
omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent Being of their inferences from
Nature. The God and Father of Jesus was thus combined with various,
often much lower thoughts of Deity in the Bible, and then further
obscured by the Deity of the current views of physical and human nature.
It is not surprising that few Christians possessed a truly Christian
view of God.
Loyalty to Jesus compels us to begin with Him. If He is the Way, we
are not justified in taking half a dozen other roads, and using Him as
one path among many. We ask ourselves what was the highest inspiration
of Jesus, what was the Being to whom He responded with His obedient
trust and with whom He communed. We are eager not to fashion an image of
Divinity for ourselves, which is idolatry as truly when our minds grave
it in thought as when our hands shape it in stone; but to receive God's
disclosure of Himself with a whole-hearted re
sponse,
and interpret, as faithfully as we can, the impression He makes upon us.
"God," writes Tyndal, the martyr translator of our English New
Testament, "is not man's imagination, but that only which He saith of
Himself." Our highest inspirations come to us from Jesus, and He is,
therefore, God's Self-unveiling to us, God's "Frankness," His Word made
flesh.
Responding to God through Jesus, Christians discover:
First, that God is their Christlike Father, and that He is love as
Jesus experienced His love and Himself was love.
Second, that God is the Lord of heaven and earth. We do not know
whether He is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent; there is much that
leads us to think that He is limited. He can do no more than Love can do
with His children, and Love has its defeats, and crosses, and tragedies.
But trusting the Christlike Father we more and more discover that He is
sufficiently in control over all things to accomplish through them His
will. He needs us to help Him master nature, and transform it into the
servant of man,—to control disease, to harness elec
tricity,
to understand earthquakes; and He needs us to help Him conquer human
nature and conform it to the likeness of His Son. God's complete
lordship waits until His will is done in earth as it is in heaven; but
for the present we believe that He is wise and strong enough not to let
nature or men defeat His purpose; that He is controlling all things so
that they work together for good unto them that love Him.
And third, that God is the indwelling Spirit. The Christlike Father
Lord, whom we find outside ourselves through the faith and character of
Jesus, becomes as we enter into fellowship with Him, a Force within us.
He is the Conscience of our consciences, the Wellspring of motives and
impulses and sympathies. We repeat, today, in some degree, the
experience of the first disciples at Pentecost; we recognize within
ourselves the inspiring, guiding and energizing Spirit of love.
While we find God primarily through Jesus, He reveals Himself to us
in many other ways: in the Scriptures, where the generations before us
have garnered their experiences of Him; in living epistles in Chris
tian
men and women, and in some who do not call themselves by the Christian
name, but whose lives disclose the Spirit of God who was in Jesus; in
non-Christian faiths, where God has always given some glimpse of Himself
in answer to men's search. Christ is not for us confining but defining;
He gives us in Himself the test to assay the Divine.
Nor do experiences which we label religious exhaust the list of our
contacts with God. Our sense of duty, whether we connect it with God or
not, brings us in touch with Him. Many persons are unconsciously serving
God through their obedience to conscience. It was said of the French
savant, Littré, that he was a saint who did not believe in God. He
made the motto of his life, "To love, to know, to serve"; and no
intelligent follower of Him who said, "Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of
My brethren, even these least, ye did it unto Me," will fail to admit
that in such a life there is a genuine, though unrecognized communion
with God. In our own day when conscience is erecting new standards of
responsibility, rendering intolerable many things good people have put
up with, demonstrating the horror and
hatefulness of war and forcing us to
probe its causes and motives, discontenting us with our industrial
arrangements, our business practices, our social order, God is giving us
a larger and better Ideal, a fuller vision of Himself. We know what our
Christlike Father is in Jesus; but we shall appreciate and understand
Him infinitely better as He becomes embodied in the principles and
ideals that dominate every home, and trade, and nation.
Again, our perception of beauty affords us a glimpse of God. The
Greeks embodied loveliness in their statues of the Divine, because
through the satisfaction which came to them from such exquisite figures
their souls were soothed and uplifted. They have left on record how the
calm and majestic expression of a face carved by a Phidias quieted,
charmed, strengthened them. Dion Chrysostom says of the figure of the
Olympian Zeus, "Whosoever among mortal men is most utterly toil-worn in
spirit, having drunk the cup of many sorrows and calamities, when he
stands before this image, methinks, must utterly forget all the terrors
and woes of this mortal life." The Greek
Christian fathers often tell us that
the same sense of the infinitely Fair, which was roused in them by such
sights, recurred in a higher degree when their thoughts dwelt upon the
life and character of Jesus. Clement of Alexandria says, "He is so
lovely as to be alone loved by us, whose hearts are set on the true
beauty." Our æsthetic and our religious experiences often merge; our
response to beauty, whether in nature, or music, or a painting, becomes
a response to God. Wordsworth says of a lovely landscape that had
stamped its views upon his memory:
Oft in lonely rooms, and mid the
din
Of towns and cities, I have owed to
them,
In hours of weariness, sensations
sweet,
Felt in the blood, and felt along the
heart;
And passing even into my purer mind
With tranquil restoration:—feelings
too
Of unremembered pleasure; such,
perhaps,
As have no slight or trivial
influence
On that best portion of a good man's
life,
His little, nameless, unremembered
acts
Of kindness and of love.
Shelley, while insistently denying or defying all the gods of
accepted religion, finds himself adoring
that Beauty
Which penetrates and clasps and fills
the world,
Scarce visible for extreme
loveliness.
Surely the God Christians adore is in these experiences, though men
know it not. St. Augustine believed that "all that is beautiful comes
from the highest Beauty, which is God." They who begin with the cult of
Beauty may have a conception of the Divine that has nothing to do with,
or is even opposed to, the God and Father of Jesus; but when His God is
supreme, inspirations from all things lovely may vastly supplement our
thought of Him. "Music on earth much light upon heaven has thrown."
Science, too, has its contribution to offer to our thought of Him who
is over all and through all and in all. Truth is one, and scientific
investigation and religious experience are two avenues that lead to the
one Reality faith names God. Science of itself can never lead us beyond
visible and tangible facts; but its array of facts may suggest to faith
many things about the invisible Father, the Lord of all. Present-day
science with its emphasis upon continuity makes us think of a God who is
no occasional visitor, but
everywhere and always active; its
conception of evolution brings home to us the patient and longsuffering
labor of a Father who worketh even until now; its stress upon law
reminds us that He is never capricious but reliable; its practical
mastery of forces, like those which enable men to use the air or to
navigate under the water, recalls to us the old command to subdue the
earth as sons of God, and adds the new responsibility to use our
control, as the Son of God always did, in love's cause.
Philosophy, too, which Professor James has described as "our more or
less dumb sense of what life honestly and deeply means," helps us to
make clear our idea of God. A philosopher is just a thoughtful person
who takes the discoveries that his religious, moral, æsthetic,
scientific experiences have brought home, and tries to set in order all
he knows of truth, beauty, right, God.
In attempting to philosophize upon their discoveries of God,
Christian thinkers have arrived at the doctrine of the Trinity in Unity.
It was, first, an attempt to hold fast to the great foundation truth of
the Old
always in touch with the one Lord
of all, our Christlike Father.
In this Unity Christians have spoken of a Trinity. Paul summing up
the blessing of God, speaks of "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and
the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit." He says,
"through Jesus we have our access in one Spirit unto the Father." He and
his fellow believers had been redeemed from selfishness to love, from
slavery to freedom; and they accounted for their new life by saying
that, through the grace of Jesus, they had come to experience the
fatherly love of God, and to find His Spirit binding them in a
brotherhood of service for one another and the world. The New Testament
goes no further: it states these experiences of Jesus, of God, of the
Spirit; but it does not tell us the exact relations of the Three—how God
is related to the Spirit, or Jesus distinct and at the same time one
with the Father. So acute a thinker as Paul never seems to have worked
this out. At one time he compares God's relation to His Spirit to man's
relation to his spirit ("Who among men knoweth the things of a man, save
the spirit of
the
man which is in him? even so the things of God none knoweth, save the
Spirit of God"); and once he identifies the Spirit with the glorified
Christ ("The Lord is the Spirit").
But while Paul and other New Testament writers did not feel the need
of thinking out what their threefold experience of God implied as to His
Being, later Christians did; and using the terms of the current Greek
philosophy, they elaborated the conception of three "Persons" in one
Godhead. We have no exact equivalent in English for the Greek word which
is translated "person" in this definition. It is not the same as "a
person" for that would give us three gods; nor is it something
impersonal, a mode or aspect of God. It is something in between a
personality and a personification.
Let us remember that this doctrine is not in the New Testament, but
is an attempt to explain certain experiences that are ascribed in the
New Testament to Jesus, the Father, the Holy Spirit. Even the hardiest
thinkers caution us that our knowledge of God is limited to a knowledge
of His relations to us: Augustine says, "the workings of the
Trinity are inseparable," and
Calvin, commenting on a passage whose "aim is shortly to sum up all that
is lawful for men to know of God," notes that it is "a description, not
of what He is in Himself, but of what He is to us, that our knowledge of
Him may stand rather in a lively perception, than in a vain and airy
speculation." But let us also recall that in this doctrine generations
of Christians have conserved indispensable elements in their thought of
God:—His fatherhood, His Self-disclosure in Christ, His spiritual
indwelling in the Christian community. Wherever it has been cast aside,
something vitalizing to Christian life has gone with it. But at present
it is not a doctrine of much practical help to many religious people;
and it often constitutes a hindrance to Jews and Mohammedans, and to
some born within the Church in their endeavor to understand and have
fellowship with the Christian God.
We may adopt one of two attitudes towards it: we may accept it
blindly as "a mystery" on the authority of the long centuries of
Christian thought, which have used it to express their faith in
God—hardly a
Protestant or truly Christian position which bids us "Prove all things;
hold fast that which is good"; or we may consider it reverently as the
attempt of the Christian Church of the past to interpret its discovery
of God as the Father Lord, revealed in Christ, and active within us as
the Spirit of love; and use it in so far as it makes our experience
richer and clearer, remembering that it is only a man-made attempt to
interpret Him who passeth understanding. The important matter is not the
orthodoxy of our doctrine, but the richness of our personal experience
of God. Dr. Samuel Johnson said: "We all know what light is; but
it is not so easy to tell what it is." Christians know, at least
in part, what God is; but it is far from easy to state what He is; and
each age must revise and say in its own words what God means to it. Here
is a statement in which generations of believers have summed up their
intercourse with the Divine. Have we entered into the fulness of their
fellowship with God?
Do we know Him as our Father? This does not mean merely that we
accept the idea of His kinship with our spirits and trust His
kindly disposition towards us; but
that we let Him establish a direct line of paternity with us and father
our impulses, our thoughts, our ideals, our resolves. Jesus' sonship was
not a relation due to a past contact, but to a present connection. He
kept taking His Being, so to speak, again and again from God, saying,
"Not as I will, but as Thou wilt." His every wish and motive had its
heredity in the Father whom He trusted with childlike confidence, and
served with a grown son's intelligent and willing comradeship.
Fatherhood meant to Jesus authority and affection; obedience and
devotion on His part maintained and perfected His sonship.
Further, we cannot, according to Jesus, be in sonship with this
Father save as we are in true brotherhood with all His children. God is
(to employ a colloquial phrase) "wrapped up" in His sons and daughters,
and only as we love and serve them, are we loving and serving Him. In
Jesus' summary of the Law He combined two apparently conflicting
obligations, when He said, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all
thy heart, and thou shalt love thy neighbor." If a man
loves God with his all, how can
there be any remainder of love to devote to someone else? What we do for
any man—the least, the last, the lost,—we do for God. We do not know Him
as Father, until we possess the obligating sense of our kinship with all
mankind, and say, "Our Father."
Do we know God in the Son? There is a sense in which Jesus is the
"First Person" in the Christian Trinity. Our approach to God begins with
Him. In St. Paul's familiar benediction, the grace of our Lord Jesus
Christ precedes the love of God. We know God's love only as we
experience the grace of Jesus. We cannot experience that grace except as
we let Jesus be Lord. Absolute and entire self-commitment to Him allows
Him to renew us after His own likeness and equip us for service in His
cause. He cannot transform a partially devoted life, nor use a
half-dedicated man. Those who yield Him lordship, treating Him as God by
giving Him their adoring trust and complete obedience, discover His
Godhood. To them He proves Himself, by all that He accomplishes in and
through them, worthy of their fullest
devotion and reverence. He becomes to
them God manifest in a human life.
While in the order of our experience Jesus comes first, as we follow
Him, He makes Himself always second. He points us from Himself to the
Father, like Himself and greater; "My Father is greater than I." There
is a remoteness, as well as a nearness, in God; it is His "greaterness"
which gives worth to His likeness. To use a philosophical phrase, only
the transcendent God can be truly immanent. We prize Immanuel—God
with us, because through Him we climb to God above us. Jesus
is the Way; but no one wishes to remain forever en route; he arrives;
and home is the Father. Jesus is the image of the invisible God; but the
image on the retina of our eye is not something on which we dwell; we
see through it the person with whom we are face to face. We know God our
Father in His Son. Every aspect of Jesus' character unveils for us an
aspect of the character of the Lord of heaven and earth. Every
experience through which Jesus passed in His life with men suggests to
us an experience through which our Father is passing with us His
children. The cross on Calvary is a
picture of the age-long and present sacrifice of our God as He suffers
with and for us. The open grave is for us the symbol of His
unconquerable love, stronger than the world and sin and death. God's
embodiment of Himself in this Son, made in all points like ourselves,
attests the essential kinship between Him and us—God's humanity and our
potential divinity.
Do we know God in the Spirit? His incarnation in Jesus evidences His
"incarnability," and His eagerness to have His fulness dwell in every
son who will receive Him. To know God in the Spirit is so to follow
Jesus that we share His sonship with the Father and have Him abiding in
us, working through us His works, manifesting Himself in our mortal
lives.
Our Father is the great public Spirit of the universe, the most
responsible and responsive Being in existence. The needs of all are
claims on His service, their sins are burdens of guilt on His
conscience, their joys and woes enlist His sympathy. He has His life in
the lives of His children. The Spirit is God's Life in men, God living
in
them. To
possess His will to serve, His sense of obligation, His interest and
compassion, is to have the Holy Spirit dwelling and regnant in us. It
was so that the Father's Spirit possessed Jesus and made His abode in
Him; and the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the Father and of the Son in
the Christian community.
And what a difference it makes whether we feel that the
responsibilities our consciences force us to assume, the sympathies in
which our hearts go out, the interests we are impelled to take, the
resolves and longings and purposes within us, are just our own, or are
God's inspirations! If they are simply ours, who knows what will come of
them? If they are His, we can yield to them assured that it is God who
worketh in us to will and to do of His good pleasure.
Our faith in God as Self-imparting by His Spirit makes possible our
confident expectation that He can and will incarnate Himself socially in
the whole family of His children, as once He was incarnate in Jesus.
Christians who devote themselves to fashioning social relations after
the mind of Christ, and inspiring their brethren with His faith
and purpose, are conscious that
through them the Spirit of God is entering more and more into His world,
revealing the Father in the new community of love, which is being born.
Sir Edward Burne-Jones once wrote: "That was an awful word of Ruskin's,
that artists paint God for the world. There's a lump of greasy pigment
at the end of Michael Angelo's hog-bristle brush, and by the time it has
been laid on the stucco, there is something there, that all men with
eyes recognize as Divine. Think what it means: it is the power of
bringing God into the world—making God manifest!" Men and women who are
molding homes and industries, towns and nations, so that they embody
love, and influencing for righteousness the least and lowest of the
children of men, are putting before a whole world's eyes the Divine, are
helping build the habitation of God in the Spirit. Through them God
imparts Himself to mankind.
God over all—the Father to whom we look up with utter trust, and from
whom moment by moment we take our lives in obedient devotion; God
through all—through Jesus supremely, and through every