Ainsworth, Henry

AINSWORTH, HENRY (1571-1622), English Nonconformist divine and
scholar, was born of yeoman stock in 1570/1 at Swanton Morley, Norfolk.
He was for four years from December 1587 a scholar of Caius College,
Cambridge, and, after associating with the Puritan party in the Church,
eventually joined the Separatists. Driven abroad about the year 1593,
he found a home in “a blind lane at Amsterdam.” He acted as “porter” to
a scholarly bookseller in that city, who, on discovering his skill in
the Hebrew language, made him known to his countrymen. When part of the
London church, of which Francis Johnson (then in prison) was pastor,
reassembled in Amsterdam, Ainsworth was chosen as their doctor or
teacher. In 1596 he took the lead in drawing up a confession of their
faith, which he reissued in Latin in 1598 and dedicated to the various
universities of Europe (including St Andrews, Scotland). Johnson joined
his flock in 1597, and in 1604 he and Ainsworth composed An Apology or
Defence of such true Christians as are commonly but unjustly called
Brownists. The task of organizing the church was not easy and
dissension was rife. Of Ainsworth it may be said that, though often
embroiled in controversy, he never put himself forward; yet he was the
most steadfast and cultured champion of the principles represented by
the early Congregationalists. Amid all the strife of controversy, he
steadily pursued his rabbinical studies. The combination was so unique
that many, like the encyclopaedists L. Moreri and J. H. Zedler, have
made two Henry Ainsworths—one Dr Henry Ainsworth, a learned biblical
commentator; the other H. Ainsworth, an arch-heretic and “the ringleader
of the Separatists at Amsterdam.” Some confusion has also been
occasioned through his not unfriendly controversy with one John
Ainsworth, who abjured the Anglican for the Roman church. In 1608
Ainsworth answered Richard Bernard’s The Separatist Schisme. But his
ablest and most arduous minor work in controversy was his reply to John
Smyth (commonly called “the Se-Baptist”), entitled a Defence of Holy
Scripture, Worship and Ministry used in the Christian Churches separated
from Antichrist, against the Challenges, Cavils and Contradictions of Mr
Smyth (1609). In 1610 he was forced reluctantly to withdraw, with a
large part of their church, from F. Johnson and those who adhered to
him. For some time a difference of principle, as to the church’s right
to revise its officers’ decisions, had been growing between them,
Ainsworth taking the more Congregational view. (See CONGREGATIONALISM.)
But in spirit he remained a man of peace. His memory abides through his
rabbinical learning. The ripe fruit of many years’ labour appeared in
his Annotations—on Genesis (1616); Exodus (1617); Leviticus (1618);
Numbers (1619); Deuteronomy (1619); Psalms (including a metrical
version, 1612); Song of Solomon (1623). These were collected in folio
in 1627, and again in 1639, and later in various forms. From the outset
the Annotations took a commanding place, especially among continental
scholars, and he established for English nonconformity a tradition of
culture and scholarship. There is no probability about the narrative
given by Neal in his History of the Puritans (ii. 47) that he was
poisoned by certain Jews. He died in 1622, or early in 1623, for in
that year was published his Seasonable Discourse, or a Censure upon a
Dialogue of the Anabaptists, in which the editor speaks of him as a
departed worthy.
LITERATURE.—John Worthington’s Diary (Chetham Society), by Crossley,
i. 263-266; works of John Robinson (1851); H. M. Dexter,
Congregationalism of the Last Three Hundred Years (1880); W. E. A. Axon,
H. Ainsworth, the Puritan Commentator (1889); F. J. Powicke, Henry
Barrow and the Exiled Church of Amsterdam (1900), J. H. Shakespeare,
Baptist and Congregational Pioneers (1906).
|







|